911 = Conspiracy

Advance-knowledge debate

Home
September 11, 2001 Attacks
Official Version
Conspiracy Theories
911 Fact Sheet
Multimedia
Photos
What Can I Do?
What can you read or view
Favorite Links
Contact Me

The issue of whether anyone outside al-Qaeda was aware that the attacks were going to take place has been a subject of some debate. Among the issues debated are: whether the Bush Administration or military knew about the threat of planes being used as missiles; how much the intelligence agencies knew about al-Qaeda activities inside the United States; whether the put options placed on United Airlines and American Airlines, and other questionable trades, indicate foreknowledge; whether the warnings from foreign countries were specific enough to have warranted action; whether intelligence information gathered about imminent al-Qaeda attacks was specific enough to have warranted action; the extent to which the alleged hijackers were under surveillance prior to the attacks; and whether agents of the Mossad or the Pakistani Inter-Services Intelligence were aware that the attacks were going to take place.

It has been claimed that action or inaction by U.S. officials with foreknowledge was intended to ensure that the attacks took place successfully. For example, Michael Meacher, former British environment minister and member of Tony Blair's Cabinet till June 2003, was widely criticized for claiming that America knowingly failed to prevent the attacks.Meacher had in March voted for the Iraq war, and had voted against an investigation into it afterward.On the war with Iraq, Mr Meacher is among those who feels he and others in government were misled.

Copyright of Marie-Eve Malenfant. This site was created only for information purposes, its for you to decide what you believe about the subject.
© 2008